Wednesday, August 24, 2016
Pete's Dragon, mini movie review
Rating: 3.25 out of 5 stars
I hear from so many friends that Hollywood has a creativity problem. There are a boat load of remakes, sequels, and prequels. Just earlier this year Disney released a live action version of The Jungle Book, which did phenomenally well. I saw it in French in a little theater in Issoudun, and it was charming, though for the most part I was theorizing what was going on. Really need to see it in English. Last year Disney did a live action Cinderella. Next year is Beauty and the Beast. And they just recently did Alice Through the Looking Glass.
Now we have another version of Pete's Dragon, a remake of the 1977 version. The original was charming, and as a kid I was enchanted by Elliott's animation, juxtaposed unto live action. With modern technology we have CGI, but as a kid a cartoon dragon intermingling with live humans was cool. Then there were the songs: Brazzle Dazzle Day, Candle on the Water, and It's Not Easy, to name a few.
When I found out about the Pete's Dragon remake I didn't know what to expect. The trailer looked interesting, but it was obvious that this story was being removed from the original, hinting that Pete is lost in the forest and protected, for years, by a mysterious dragon. Already the heart of the original lost. Maybe it was simply a change of setting? Maybe that's all.
But no, nothing of the original movie, besides the character names of Pete and Elliot and Pete needing a new family, survive. Instead we have an original story that draws more on Jungle Book and Tarzan than on Pete's Dragon. A new plot void of originality and magic, though we are reminded over and over that this is a story about magic. Magic of the unknown and the mysterious dragons.
Don't get me wrong, there were still delightful and heart felt moments. The scene where Pete first finds Elliot had me in tears. If only the film maintained that enchantment throughout.
In sort what we have is a predictable original story that should be entitled "The Boy and his Dragon," because that's more fitting, instead of a title slapped onto a script to make a few extra bucks.
I've read what some people have said about this movie on forums. That the original Pete's Dragon is incredibly cheesy and stupid, and that this remake is an improvement. I think my issue is that so much is changed that instead of making this a remake, it should have gone in the direction of original, because so much originality is mission in Hollywood. And I just now thought of The Jungle Book, this kid being lost for six years, and how he howls like the wolves.
*Sigh*
It's still a good family film, not a musical, not Pete's Dragon, but a film children may find interesting.
MPAA: Rated PG for action, peril and brief language.
Friday, August 12, 2016
Waiting For Shooting Stars
One of my favorite things to do when I was a kid was to go with my Dad and brother Michael to the middle of nowhere to watch for meteor showers. Dazzling displays of falling stars every few minutes.
In Central California it's not hard to drive to where you can see the night sky in perfect glory. The sky so dark that the Milky Way hangs in the air like a river of stars.
We would drive to the Sierra foothills between one and four a.m., park on the side of the road, and get out our lawn chairs. We sat there for hours, our Timex watches lighting our faces every few minutes until the show would start, and then time froze as light danced across the sky.
Those moments our some of my favorite childhood memories.
Tonight, August 12th now, so technically morning, was suppose to be a magnificent meteor shower. It's 1:46 a.m. as I write this. The peak of the shower was supposed to be between one and two this morning. I went outside and didn't see anything, and now I'm in the house again. Maybe there's too much light pollution. Maybe I didn't wait long enough. Maybe I missed it. Maybe the guy on the nightly news got it wrong.
I'm standing outside again, just in case, but I still see no shooting stars. It's amazing how still the night seems this early in the morning. The crickets chirping. Lawns being watered in the distance. And cars driving fiercely on I-15. I never hear the freeway like this in the middle of the day. One star in particular is twinkling rapidly between white, blue, and red. Maybe it's a planet.
Nope. Going back inside. It's nearly 2:00.
For a second I thought I saw one, but I quickly realized that there are mountains where I saw it. Hopeful imagination.
Wishes can wait.
Dreams are waiting for me on my pillow.
Good night.
Wednesday, August 10, 2016
Finally Getting My Scottish/Highland Dance Shoes
Sunday, August 7, 2016
The Daily Battles We Face
Saturday, August 6, 2016
Suicide Squad mini movie review
Rating: 2.5 out of 5 Stars
For starters Suicide Squad is considerably better than Batman v Superman.
Second of all, I went into this movie curious. There has been a lot of buzz for this movie for well over a year. There was considerable excitement over the first released trailer; It was thought that Suicide Squad, about a group of DC comic villains getting together to save the day, would be the money monster to jump start the DC movie universe, especially after the lackluster said Batman v Superman movie.
Then the movie reviews started coming out, none of which were encouraging. Most of them bad. The sudden news of expensive re-shoots to bring the same tone from the trailer to the movie also didn't bode well, if this news was true. Again, not encouraging.
I went into this movie not knowing quite what to expect. Would it have the same humor and sparkle as the trailer? Would it be messy like Batman v Superman? Did DC finally get their act together to prove competition to Marvel?
My answer to the first question is a so-so. There was humor and good moments. There were also a lot of corny lines that felt miss placed. Now, it isn't all humorous, which is a good thing. There were some depressing moments, particularly surrounding the backstory for Will Smith's character, which worked. Parts of the movie had the right tones for what this movie was wishing to convey.
The second question, would this film be messy? Yes, yes it was. But not nearly as bad as Batman v Superman. (BTW, I completely forgot Superman died in that movie. Completely left my mind. That's how forgettable it was. I can't even remember if there was a hint if Superman survived. I should check wikipedia . . . later.) There weren't any random dream sequences created to trick the audience, feeling like some kind of drug trip of sorts. The first half of the movie was a lot of set up, dragging the pacing and timing of the movie.
Backstories are important, but it felt a bit much, though I understand their necessity. With Marvel's Avengers each character got an origin movie, and those that didn't were first placed into another movie for proper set up, so when the assembly movie came together we were able to get right to the action. There hasn't been a proper set up in previous movies for the characters in Suicide Squad, so the first part of the movie was dedicated to a lot of their set up. I didn't know anything about Will Smith's Deadshot. Margot Robbie's Harley Quinn I had familiarity with thanks to the animated DC series, which my younger brothers watched when we were kids and I occasionally watched as well.
The third question, does DC hold a candle to Marvel? Not yet. One thing DC has been struggling with, which Marvel accomplishes in spades, is good storytelling. DC struggles with telling a strong fluid story with good character development and sequence of events.
Margot Robbie's Harley Quinn is a thing of beauty; she nailed the character. Jared Leto's take on The Joker is appropriate and terrifying. The Joker had to be completely different from Heath Ledger's portrayal, and it was, fitting the tone of Suicide Squad.
In the end Suicide Squad isn't my cup of tea. Never was. Evil fighting evil is an interesting concept, but I guess I like the idea of evil becoming good, and finishing that thought would spoil stuff. I'm not a fan of glorified violence, though many didn't share my thoughts, reflected by the fact that this movie made $65 million yesterday alone, on track to make around $145 million opening weekend, according to Box Office Mojo.
Maybe DC finally found the movie to boost their movie universe after all.
MPAA: Rated PG - 13 for sequences of violence and action throughout, disturbing behavior, suggestive content and language.
Wednesday, August 3, 2016
Trying Flying Cauldron Butterscotch Beer
Sunday, July 31, 2016
Of Patriots and Pioneers
Thursday, July 28, 2016
Never Be Afraid of the Truth; Never Be Afraid of Starting Again
Miss Stacey: Sometimes people don't want to hear the truth, Anne. You see it frightens them, so they put up walls to protect themselves from it. What we must bear in mind is that all these trails and tribulations that pop up in our lives, well they serve a very useful purpose. They build character, as long as we can hold unto the lessons we've learned from our mistakes. Remember, you can always start everything afresh tomorrow.
Anne Shirley: That is a tremendous consolation Miss Stacey. Tomorrow is always fresh with no mistakes in it.
Miss Stacey: Well, with no mistakes in it, yet. As far as the truth goes, don't lose heart.
I love this movie so, so much. Every year I watch it, and just recently I watched this movie with a good friend and my sister-in-law Lindsay. The scene typed above is my favorite. Whenever I struggle with my weaknesses and mistakes I repeat the line, "Tomorrow is always fresh with no mistakes in it."
I've grown up repeating this line, but when I saw this scene I've always somehow missed the first lesson Miss Stacey was expressing to Anne. And with everything I'm experiencing personally, and with what I'm seeing in the World, I'm very grateful for these words.
With the dozens of times I've watched this movie I've missed those lines. Maybe my mind just always went silent, waiting for my most favorite line. Or maybe it represents where I am now, personally. Maybe I'm finally ready to let some things go.








